Poverty in America

Women and Children Most Hit By Hunger

Published November 19, 2009 @ 06:00AM PT

By now, many of you have probably heard the news that 49 million people in the United States did not have access to a sufficient amount of food last year, more than any year since the USDA started keeping records in 1995.  Even more disturbing, this represents a 36% increase in hunger between 2007 and 2008.

Although there has been both statistical and anecdotal evidence concerning the spread of hunger across the United States recently, a new report released by the USDA paints a more accurate, and unfortunately grim, picture of the true extent of food insecurity in the most powerful nation on earth.

The numbers themselves are startling -- 16% of all people went hungry in 2008 -- but they do not go far enough in showing who is suffering the most.

As Raj Patel points out over on Stuffed and Starved, the new data seems to show that women and children have been hit the hardest by food scarcity.  This seems less surprising when you take into account that women continue to be paid less than men for doing the same work, and that women also regularly serve as the head of single-parent households.  With all else being even, this wage disparity puts women at a very real disadvantage when it comes to food security, for themselves and for their children.

This is not a problem relegated only to the United States either.  Across the globe, women are disproportionately affected by hunger and a lack of access to adequate food.

And it's the children who end up suffering the most -- now in the United States, one out of every four children goes hungry on a regular basis.

Remember back when President Obama pledged to eliminate childhood hunger by 2015?  Yeah, I do too.  And all I can say is that if this report doesn't jump start some serious legislative action, I don't know what will.

(Photo credit: meemal on Flickr)

Related Posts

Comments (6)

  1. Virginia Woolridge

    I think the government needs to be much more efficient at delivering services that make us a stronger culture and that reflects American values - like compassion.  The Defense Department consistently receives more money from congress than they ask for.  It would be great if programs around hunger (which is health care), education, and the environment had senators and representatives fighting for them.

    Posted by Virginia Woolridge on 11/19/2009 @ 07:11AM PT

  2. Reply to thread
  3. Christine Clarke

    I think people need to take more ownership of the social behaviors that affect people's productivity and as an indirect result, the rates of hunger and of poverty.  It is not a coincidence that the top 10 food insecure states are all also the top 10 states violating children's rights by not only allowing paddling in schools but by dropping the ball on child abuse altogether.  When we mistreat growing people and destroy their early hopes, dreams and ambitions by beating them into compliance and despair, we also beat down their expectations of themselves and their expectations of their adult lives.

    These are not indirectly related problems.  Look at StopHitting.org and find the list of the top 10 paddling states.  If we want to help combat food insecurity then we should add the task of stopping school paddling in the 20 states that still allow child assault on school grounds to our chore list.   In this day and age, there is no excuse to assault anyone of any age, we know too much now about what it does to the human spirit to allow this to continue.

    Posted by Christine Clarke on 11/19/2009 @ 10:19AM PT

  4. Danetta Amschler

    Just what the blue blazes would that do?  Stopping child abuse is but one small part of the puzzle. Yes, it has potential for rippling through multiple generations, but it's neither the cause of poverty nor by any means the cause of ALL poverty nor will solving child abuse solve all poverty.  There is a LOT more at play than child abuse - for example, child abuse is often found in homes where spousal abuse is present.  Spousal abuse is often found where the abused spouse is kept from working or only allowed to work in limited jobs of the abuser's choice.  So ultimately, you're oversimplifying.  This said, actually DOING SOMETHING where child, spousal or even elder abuse DOES occur is something that isn't happening any where near adequately and really does NEED to be done.

    We, as a society, desperately need to work on developing a welfare system or whatever you want to call it that WORKS.  One that recognizes ALL causes of poverty and what poverty REALLY IS - not the delusional, far below subsistence, impossible to honestly survive on, income level that's currently recognized as poverty.  The mistaken assessment of poverty in itself contributes greatly to how many women and children go without adequate food because they're unable to get adequate assistance so they CAN get enough food.  What makes me say this?  When the poverty line is off, the welfare program guidelines are off, when the guidelines are off, the assistance that's needed isn't actually available. 

    We have a nation were jobs aren't available, where families are tossed aside, where assistance can't be found and then when someone goes hungry it's mysteriously the one who's hungry's fault. Just how cruel and inhumane can we get as a nation? Somehow, we forget that human rights don't just extend to political rights and freedoms - they extend to certain economic rights too, such as being able to obtain minimal food, shelter and health care without regard to why a person is unable to afford such on their own.  We can't say we're civilized when we're picking and choosing what human rights are rights.

    Posted by Danetta Amschler on 11/21/2009 @ 10:59PM PT

  5. Christine Clarke

    What would it do?  It would stop injuring young people's aspirations for one thing.  Yes, when families are tossed aside and children are permitted by negligent child laws to be assaulted in their own homes, 'assistance can't be found' but its more than just governmental assistance -- its a question of the human will to pick oneself up, dust oneself off and forage for oneself - to go out and make a future rather than hope one will materialize around you.  

    Child assault hurts more than citizens' bodies, it hurts their perspectives on life too.

    Not only that, but there is coincidence between an article that had been printed here on Change.org some time ago about which 10 states were the most food insecure - and the top 10 states that are the worst offenders for corporal punishment injuries, hospitalizations and deaths upon children.  The lists were almost identical not just in terms of the states that appeared on the list but their order also.

    Could it be that these are coincidental reports and related more to poverty than to the physical assault upon the human spirit?  Possible.  I am among those, however, who believe that when you beat down a child's self esteem, self worth and dreams for his own future, you also beat down his chances in life to be something more than the lowest common denominator of what he sees around him.


    Here, take a look at this report as additional information on topic:

    http://www.phoenixchildrens.com/PDFs/principles_and_practices-of_effective_discipline.pdf

     

    Posted by Christine Clarke on 11/24/2009 @ 06:40AM PT

  6. Danetta Amschler

    Despite having endured both child abuse and spousal abuse, I'd still say you're oversimplifying.  Poverty didn't cause me to be abused and abuse didn't cause me to land in poverty.  Poverty didn't cause my Dad to be abusive nor did it have anything to do with why my Mom was unable/unwilling/whatever to stop him or with why California was unwilling/unable to do squat about the situation. Poverty definitely doesn't have anything to do with why my not-quite-an-ex grew up to be abusive.  It may raise the risk of abuse somewhat by raising stress but it doesn't cause abuse.  Though I will agree that poverty does cause great harm to the human spirit as does abuse.    This said, they're cultural things that need to be dealt with SEPARATELY because while they MAY exist together and being present together makes both at least feel worse, there's no causatory link between them.  Rich people are capable of abuse too - they just often hide it better. 

    Posted by Danetta Amschler on 11/24/2009 @ 10:28AM PT

  7. Reply to thread
  8. linda partee

    women and children need help more and better assistance for food day care financial assistance

    Posted by linda partee on 11/22/2009 @ 05:39PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Greg Plotkin

Greg Plotkin is currently a grant-writer living in Washington, DC. As a two-year AmeriCorps member teaching in DC Public Schools, he saw families struggling with poverty on a daily basis and has become particularly interested in hunger, nutrition and food access issues. He has also viewed poverty through the lens of his work with Habitat for Humanity and Charlie's Place--a DC soup kitchen and homeless support center.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action. If you already have an account click here.

  Cancel