Poverty in America

Top Ten Videos on Poverty in the U.S.

Published December 30, 2008 @ 11:40AM PT

This collection of award-winning documentaries, news stories, and advocacy campaign videos illustrate the range of faces and issues of domestic poverty.  Portrayals include Latina immigrants in Los Angeles organizing for worker protections; two New Orleanians recovering from the impact of Hurricane Katrina; gentrification conflict in Columbus, Ohio; and educational intervention in the lives at at-risk boys in Baltimore.

1) Campaign to Reduce Poverty in America,” Catholic Charities U.S.A.: A very straightforward, six minute overview of the causes, consequences, and faces of poverty from one of the largest social service organizations in the U.S. The goal of the Campaign is to cut domestic poverty in half by 2020; suggestions for activism are included.

2) The Boys of Baraka, Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady, 2005: “African-American boys have a very high chance of being incarcerated or killed before they reach adulthood. In Baltimore, one of the country's most poverty-stricken cities for inner-city residents, the Baraka School project was founded to break the cycle of violence through an innovative education program that literally removed young boys from low-performing public schools and unstable home environments.” Winner of multiple awards.

3) Flag Wars, Linda Goode Bryant and Laura Poitras, 2003: “Flag Wars is a stark look inside the conflicts that surface when black working-class families are faced with an influx of white gay homebuyers to their Columbus, Ohio neighborhood.” “From porch conversations and family dinners to public hearings and street protests, Flag Wars provides a rare and extraordinarily intimate account of the social and human consequences of capitalism and the pursuit of the "American Dream" told through the lives of residents in a community confronted by gentrification.” Gentrification and displacement are major problems affecting low-income Americans.

4)The Other America,” CBS News, October 1, 2008: A 2 minute, informative news clip highlighting an emblematic, city-run “tent city” in Reno, NV, where the newly homeless are living alongside the chronically homeless after falling into economic hardship.

5) Trouble the Water, Tia Deal and Carl Lessin, 2008: This “film tells the story of an aspiring rap artist and her streetwise husband, trapped in New Orleans by deadly floodwaters, who survive the storm and then seize a chance for a new beginning. It’s a redemptive tale of self-described street hustlers who become heroes that takes you inside Hurricane Katrina in a way never before seen on screen. … Intertwining Kim and Scott’s insider’s view of Katrina and powerful video with a mix of verite and in-your-face filmmaking, [Tia] Deal and [Carl] Lessin follow their story through the storm and its aftermath, and into a new life. Along the way, they discover Kim’s musical talent as rap artist Black Kold Madina when she finds the only existing copy of her recorded music survived the storm with a relative in Memphis. Kim’s performance in that moment reveals not only devastating skills as a musician, but compacts her life story into explosive poetry that paints a devastating picture of poverty.”

6) ACORN 2008 Democracy Campaign and ACORN and the Fight Against Voter Suppression: An overview of ACORN’s long-time work organizing low-income Americans, and, in partnership with Balcony Films, a pointed rebuttal of the specious attacks of voter fraud by the GOP during the 2008 Presidential campaign.

7) The Greening of Newark, Center for American Progress (CAP), September 25, 2008: “An Inside Look at How Newark is Transforming Its Economy.” 21% of all families in Newark live in poverty. 43% of all single mothers with children live in poverty in Newark, a city torn apart in 1967 by rebellions over poverty, racism, police brutality, and oppression. CAP also offers this in-depth video discussion on green collar jobs with activist Van Jones.

8) Made in L.A., Almudena Carracedo and Robert Bahar, 2007: “Made in L.A. follows the remarkable story of three Latina immigrants working in Los Angeles garment sweatshops as they embark on a three-year odyssey to win basic labor protections from trendy clothing retailer Forever 21. In intimate observational style, Made in L.A. reveals the impact of the struggle on each woman’s life as they are gradually transformed by the experience. Compelling, humorous, deeply human, Made in L.A. is a story about immigration, the power of unity, and the courage it takes to find your voice.” Winner of multiple awards.

9) Take It From Me, Emily Abt, 2001 and Love and Diane, Jennifer Dworkin, 2003: Take It From Me reveals “the experiences of several women and their families” after welfare reform in 1996. “…the new welfare system, with its recent controversial reforms, may make it easier to ignore rather than confront the complexities of poverty amidst plentitude. Quietly powerful, the film offers a vivid portrait of resilience amidst the daunting reality of being poor. In doing so, it deeply recognizes the humanity of those most vulnerable of Americans.”

“Love and Diane tells the epic story of a family over three generations. For Love, the world changed forever when she and her siblings were torn from their mother, Diane. Separated from her family and thrust into a terrifying world of institutions and foster homes…Now Love must face the same ordeal her mother had faced years before. She is charged with neglect and must prove to a world of social workers, therapists and prosecutors that she is a fit mother…While the film takes us deep into the life of a single family, it also offers a provocative look at the Byzantine "system" that aims to help but as often frustrates the family's attempts to improve their situation. The film…aims instead to immerse the viewer in the experiences and thoughts of a family trying to survive and retain autonomy in the face of terrible challenges.”

10)Woman Convulses and Dies, Ignored, in Waiting Room of Hospital”, July 2, 2008: Associated Press coverage, via Brave New Films, of an indigent woman needing psychiatric care who died after waiting almost 24 hours in the emergency room of a New York City public hospital. Additional coverage is here.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (6)

  1. I notice you aren't talking about curing poverty here just complaining about what is obvious to everyone. What I am reading is a long litany of lobbying effort to get money for your cause without strings or accountability attached. I notice also that you and the entire Obama team aren't asking for solutions to problems.  Do you people think you know everything?

    Let me pose an ethical dilemma for you, President Obama and his entire team and challenge you to step up and answer it or shut up and close this blog down as useless.

    Some facts;
    You (they) say we have a homeless problem.
    You (they) say we have an employment problem.
    You (they) say we have a economic stimulus package of money we don't have to get the economy moving again.
    With that in mind do you really think just creating jobs will solve anything? Seriously?

    Here comes your ethics test.
    What will you do with information that would cure poverty for 300,000 heads of households per year? Create $60 Billion in equity. Save tax expenditure. Create tax revenue. Helps the environment. Create new companies that would then be able to hire tens of thousands of others to support the effort. Creates a nationwide trade school for the residential trades. Lowers crime rates. Empties homeless shelters and for the grand finale................ Have it done in 60 seconds without tax payer money.

    Here is what you are about to ignore.

    In any average year we demolish about 300,000 houses in this country.
    The average house costs about $200,000.00
    So we are throwing away about $60 Billion Dollars in home ownership opportunities into landfills.

    What can be done with that information? How can you and our brand new President take advantage of this information?

    'If' citizen Obama got in front of a mic and simply asked,

    -----------------------------------------------------------
    I am going to start createing jobs now and towards that end set up a nationwide trade school and am asking America to stop demolishing the houses we were going to throw away and give them to me instead to create jobs and homeownership opportunities with.
     
    I am setting up a blog spot for heads of households now living in shelters and cars all over America to get to a library and let us know how to get in touch with you. Go to Obama jobs.com right now and fill in the information.

    The jobs pay $450.00 a week and each person that partners with us will get a house, free and clear, out of the deal.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

    but that's a big 'if' isn't it?

    How does it get paid for? Citizen Obama will have to make a phone call or two.

    In closing let me remind you of the ethics test and that you are expected to tell me why you won't do this. Here is how I will pass this ethics test. I give this information free of charge without obligation to me now or ever.

    Very Sincerely Yours,
    Tom Canavan
    The Benefactor Project.com
    336-388-2223
    Pelham, NC 27311

    Ps. If you are just a regular guy reading this and want to put your family back into a house then go to the website and take the advice, it's free. 







    Posted by Tom Canavan on 01/02/2009 @ 12:26PM PT

  2. Reply to thread
  3. Bob Jones

    Perhaps I'm a simple guy, but the issue that I struggle with is also a moral dillemma: what should be done with the fraction of poor people who DON'T WANT to contribute to society, as well as those who NEVER HAVE and NEVER WILL. Is it "right" to let those people leech off society?
    It is very sad that the poor who REALLY DO WANT to work and contribute to society are often lumped in with those that do not.
    Has anyone considered a WORK-FARE instead of WELL-FARE system? The incentives to find and keep work need to be revamped drastically.

    Posted by Bob Jones on 01/03/2009 @ 09:42AM PT

  4. Lee Butz

    I understand the concerns here, but to me, the moral dilema is doing nothing to help, or being ineffective because we're worried about the relatively few abusers. These people will eventually fall through cracks of their own making. Forget them.
    To base the qualification for care on who does or doesn't want to work is ignoring those who are struggling because they can't work, due to things such as health, age, or need to care for someone else. For instance, one of the fastest-growing communities in the U.S. is grandparents raising their grandchildren. These are not always children of addicts or law breakers, and the grandparents' only income may be Social Security. The only way to get a higher SS allowance is to adopt the grandchildren, which is financially difficult for many, and, while foster families get school lunch and tuition reductions automatically, grandparents must meet income guidelines, even if the court has appointed them legal guardians. A senior's Social Security allowance is above the income cap. Using only the child's income to qualify may be the guideline, but it is not the reality.
    Now is not the time to worry about leeches, who live in all income levels and social communities. We're already years late in taking care of those who need and deserve our help and gratitude, no strings attached.

    Posted by Lee Butz on 01/04/2009 @ 07:24AM PT

  5. Leigh Graham

    Hi everyone - I've been away with family while the site officially launched and only now have the opportunity to respond to all your comments.

    First, Happy New Year!  Second, Lee responded to Bob as well as I could have, and possibly more patiently (our Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - TANF - main public assistance program is basically "workfare").

    @ Tom - this site is not affiliated with the Obama Administration; that's change.gov.

    Posted by Leigh Graham on 01/04/2009 @ 03:19PM PT

  6. robin stelly

    It always amazes me when people spend time worrying that some people who don't want to contribute to society may get a break and then use that concern to sidetrack discussions about how to help the vast majority of poor people who do want to be productive.  I'm going to assume that anyone who's worried about people getting a free ride is also in favor of a 100% estate tax.  Until they are, I don't want to hear about how the poor are getting off easy.

    Posted by robin stelly on 01/08/2009 @ 07:52AM PT

  7. Leigh Graham

    Robin - nice!!

    Posted by Leigh Graham on 01/08/2009 @ 09:03AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Leigh Graham

Leigh is a PhD candidate in urban planning at MIT, and a consultant on U.S. Gulf Coast recovery. She sits on the Board of the Allston-Brighton Community Development Corporation in Boston, and has worked with non-profits, foundations and local governments on policies and programs aimed at reducing urban poverty and inequality.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.