The Flawed U.S. Poverty Measure
Published October 24, 2009 @ 09:00AM PT

New data released recently by the Census Bureau highlights a gigantic problem many Americans are already painfully aware of: the way the U.S. government measures poverty is extremely flawed.
Because official poverty estimates do not take into account factors like rising medical care, transportation, child care or geographical variations in living costs, the Census Bureau publishes alternative data using a poverty measure developed by the National Academy of Sciences.
This new data shows that there are 7 million more Americans living in poverty than initially reported by the agency last month, and brings the total poverty rate in the U.S. to nearly 16 percent. What I found most shocking is that the original Census Bureau figures failed to capture half of all elderly living in poverty (official estimate was 9.7 percent, but the new figures show 18.7 percent of persons 65+ currently live in poverty).
Apparently the government has been tossing around the idea of updating its official poverty gauge (which by the way, was developed way back in 1955 and has not been updated since 1964) for awhile now. My question is, what's the f'ing hold up?
Our outdated poverty measure not only fails to take into consideration significant economic factors like regional cost of living, but it also fails to capture millions of Americans who are in need of aid but not officially classified as being impoverished.
I would think that one of the most important factors in helping to alleviate poverty is actually knowing how many people fit that classification. As New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (an advocate for an updated poverty measure) has said, "If you can't measure it, you can't manage it."
It's pretty clear the the federal government is not doing a good job of addressing the root causes of poverty in America. Perhaps it's because they're wasting precious resources on analyzing, presenting and distributing the same data in two ways (one they KNOW isn't even accurate). Just saying...
(Photo credit: pedrosimoes7 on Flickr)
Share this Post
Related Posts
Comments (18)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Greg Plotkin is currently a grant-writer living in Washington, DC. As a two-year AmeriCorps member teaching in DC Public Schools, he saw families struggling with poverty on a daily basis and has become particularly interested in hunger, nutrition and food access issues. He has also viewed poverty through the lens of his work with Habitat for Humanity and Charlie's Place--a DC soup kitchen and homeless support center.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Great Greg, you use a keyboard for more then talking about food.
Utility, repairs and replacement, and gifts, poverty level.
No kidding. While our government bickers over are there are 40, or 48 million in poverty, the uncounted poor is closer to 120 million and beyond. 70% of all American workers are paid less then it cost to live. They are the working poor, but uncounted.
The Molly Orshansky 1964 poverty rate counted just cost of food. http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v68n3/v68n3p79.html
She did not count rents, they were cheap in the 1960's. Three hundred a month, for 5-6 rooms. But they were an expense I do not know why it wasn't counted.
Back then 90% of Employers paid the workers insurance. Now its nearly the direct opposite. Less than 20% of employers pays for workers health insurance.
The real line of poverty is found when people cannot afford to pay for the basics of life. Like, Medical, rent, food, clothes, transportation, heat, necessary items to make life tolerable. The bill before congress now HR 2909 is named for, utilities it goes beyond Food to a low accounting of rent, and other unavoidable human needs. I would also like a repairs and gifts bill poverty.
Just as the 1964 poverty level was way under the actual count. The budget for the utilities bill stands to be low. Its the people on the left, or non partisan making the new budget. They do not focus upon actual costs.
The budgets are just pie in the sky figures thrown out onto paper. A single person is expected to find an apt. for outrageously low figure like $475 a month in Maine when apartments starts at $1,000 for one bedroom in Portland ME and $750 in Waterville.
Only our advocates tossing around phrases like "Livable wages" they said in 2007 Maine needs $17, something an hour to break even. HUDS more realistic costs for rent in 2009, requires $15 and change - an hour to pay rent.
That means there is 2 dollars and whatever an hour, for 40 hour week, or $80 for food, out of pocket medical, heat, transportation, etc. Seeing as the federal and state governments has their cut, ear marked and withheld most of these $2 an hour go straight into Uncle Sam's, coffers. Not for other needed basics. Someone did not figure correctly.
But its our well paid advocates, who are selling Short the poor of America. Its a win win situation for people making even $40,000 a year. $50,303 is the middle income for Americans. The advocates keep their jobs by not counting the total of people who can pay their rent, and most other, things except for repairs and food.
To pacifier the workers, they are told they are making good wages, but if they cannot cover all the bills each month they are underpaid. And the conception is 70 of America people consider themselves as middle class when a lot of them are mired in the nightmare of poverty-just uncounted. This keeps the lower middle classes fighting with those under them. The advocates keeps their job. And Government gives Aid to 25% of the Counted poor.
Never mind, just paying for our heat, food, and rent in the same month. Think of the stove, microwave, or car needing repair, even just new tires and we poor fall a couple of months behind. Its a Major crisis.
A family in poverty can not afford birthday or winter holiday gifts, for their loved ones. I want not just a utility Bill Poverty level. I want a poverty measure who counts for repairs, and gifts.
I do not want the left nor the right, Calculating the poverty budgets. I want US POOR to do them. I want the full measure required to pay for basics, to be in the budgets.
It is time we Thrive not barely survive. It is time we give workers, the disabled and welfare moms, the full amount needed to pay all their bills, needed to live. This will make us living in a better America.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 10/24/2009 @ 05:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The hold up is that if Americans really knew how many other Americans were living in poverty, they JUST might vote for different people which means those "in power" now will lose their seats and some of their power.
Posted by Courtney C............ on 10/24/2009 @ 08:49PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
You got it CC. It is our silence which causes workers, the disabled, and welfare mothers to groan the strain of being under paid. Worker are our backbone Welfare mothers and the disable gauge the level of our humanity. So why aren't we paid a decent wage?
I will provide two last paragraphs, of a piece found on our NH homeless serve site. Of course it serves nationally. The writer is Unknown to me, goes by just Ruben but his words reaches my soul.
I want to place the entire email on line. I have to locate and join a free host group. I am in the hopes that Change will allow a partial post here, as it does provide Word for thoughts, on poverty and racism.
I was against using the terms the disabled and welfare Moms in our efforts to gain the Human right to be fully paid according to the need. But often these groups are paid in the same range as our migrant workers are paid. Americans should know about and be ashamed, of both.
"...Thus so much homelessness in the world, its primary cause being wars based on White racism, the common belief God or nature made White people superior to Non-Whites to the extent it is okay for Whites to take whatever they want from Non-Whites including their lives, lands and freedoms. The racist elite are even so selfish and greedy that they exploit and oppress poor Whites too; and these elitists are also smart, indoctrinating poor Whites to believe it is those "dirty Mexicans" who are taking their jobs and so forth, i.e., "divide and conquer."
The working poor are the backbone of the global economy. The only reason there is any semblance of a middle class left in the U.S. is because the rich need the middle class to control and regulate the poor. It's all about exploitation and oppression, brother. The Nazis, Minutemen, KKK, etc. are just stooges or puppets of the racist elites who will do whatever it takes to protect their wealth and power. Smoke and mirrors for sure. ruben"
There are many discussion points :
1. Are illegals working our crops just fine, because they provide a service few Americans provide. They provide "Working for less than 50 cents an hour".
2. Are the poor the back bone of capitalism? Well after much fighting and getting a lawyer, I attended a Canada New England Conference in 2008, where the leaders exhaulted the low wage worker's and said they need workers to work longer until the age of 70's.
I think that is the point governmental and industrial leader knew would be given a positive, spin by mid stream media. They did not know what ME. Independent News take, would be.
3. Protect our masters interest mentality, of the poor.
How invasive is this thought in the 140 Million Poor workers.
4. What is the middle class?
I learned here the middle income is $50,303 at change. The lower middle classes are the uncounted poor.
A TV Health advertisement puts the middle class who will benefit from health care at 129,000 But their are 1 million folks in Maine. I Hope that is a low count.
5. What is the middle class?
This has to do with an accurate measurement of poverty, we need a real measure of all groups.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 10/25/2009 @ 11:36AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ms. Jan, I know I get on your nerves, but I do see the validity in the argument you bring to the table. In my state the "documented" poverty rate is 56%. This doesn't count undocumented people, or the the disparity in income vs. cost of housing. I have about 38 million people in my state. (I believe our poverty rate is more around 62%, but that's just from the figures I've gathered.)
I like that you've mentioned the undocumented working for .50/hour, because this will soon set the president for the minimum wage in my state. (?Why?) Welfare has a two year limit in California. How are these women going to feed, cloth, and house their children? You can raise the minimum wage all you want, it only moves more jobs out of my state. (Then what?)
We don't need an accurate measure of poverty. We need an honest accountable government. You can look to Obama all you want, he sold us out Ms. Jan. Remember? He's only creating 250,000 jobs. I have over 15 million people living poverty- stricken, in my state alone.
My way,(the one you oppose,) would make it hard for us, but only for a while. His way, will keep us poor forever.
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/27/2009 @ 07:40PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It comes down to chosen ignorance and oh, dang it I hate the stumbling for words that comes around my migraines but what's the word that means just not giving a damn... If you can't accurately count a problem, you can't say if you have a problem much less how big it might be, therefore you don't have any real way to assess whether or not the problem needs to be dealt with nor can your opponents who insist that there IS a problem accurately say that you're wrong because you've made the "only official numbers" and those numbers by basis of how they count have chosen not to count many - like how homeless counts don't count "couch surfers" or (and I really don't get this chosen omission from their counts) "people who have cars or other vehicles in which to sleep" or how unemployment counts don't count people who've "looked too long", are "under-employed", "aren't looking hard enough", or who "might be too sick or disabled to work" (often largely on the basis of their presumption, rather than what we who are trying to work and want to work think about it or what our care providers think). As far as unemployment alone goes, I know from living in NM that the "official rumor" was that unemployment in the Four Corners area (McKinley County, Navajo, Zuni, some of the Pueblo, and I believe it might also have counted the Hopi since they're surrounded by Navajo) actually ran closer to 50% or so unemployment and nobody even wanted to think about the levels of underemployment - since most who were employed and didn't have the luck of a government job often worked multiple part-time jobs at minimum wage just to "get by", yet the OFFICIAL rate of unemployment for those areas was MUCH lower. Our government is HORRID about tweaking statistics, as if tweaking numbers really makes a problem go away - lying about the numbers only hides the truth.
I can tell anyone who wants to list from my years of working with people in poverty and now from my years as a person in poverty that the figures used are off by EASILY a few thousand per year. Why? It underestimates the cost of food, then the guidelines created using the Federal Poverty Line even more severely underestimate what it costs to rent a home and pay for heat, water and trash/sewer. I have yet to find a place where I could have a home for the allowed amount without it being a homesite leased on a reservation with a Certificate of Indian Blood where they have deals like $1/year for 100 years so I'd only be paying the utilities or to have my home elsewhere already paid so I'd only pay taxes and utilities (and with taxes, that'd be pushing the allowance). Add in having to pay ANYTHING AT ALL for medical care (even pittances of copays like for low income subsidies with Medicare Part D) or (heaven forbid) living in a higher cost of living like a state on the east or west coast - and if you're actually qualified as below poverty or even NEAR poverty mere survival is a constant struggle where each month is a string of choices like "which bill(s) should I pretend not to see or choose to pay late" and "can I or can't I afford appropriate clothing for myself/family for this season" or even "can we all (or even any of us) eat tonight". Some of these questions often even have to be asked despite the "help" of things like food banks and so forth because in some areas they pick and choose who they'll help or they simply can't help nearly enough. Or because assistance programs haven't caught up with the times and recognized that cell phones in many cases are more functional - and cheaper - than landlines. So is VOIP. But the assistance programs will ONLY help if you have a traditional landline.
Ultimately though, Congress is going to have to do SOMETHING. Or as one of my friends on another forum has said, they may see the poor gather in the streets with torches and pitchforks or whatever the modern equivalent of such might be - that is if any of the poor have enough money left to buy it, we may come just as a huddled and angry mass. This country isn't just made up of the rich and as many wise people have said over the years a great way to measure a society is how it treats people like the poor and sick. Besides, ultimately, treating the poor better would be in everyone's best interest - it would make health care cheaper, it would make us have a chance to be healthier, it would give us a chance to work longer and be more productive and such things as these would be better for the nation and those who invest in it and its corporations. So the only reasons I can see for not is apathy (that's the word I wanted at the beginning of this) and the "you can't spend MY money on those lazy poor people" crowds like the teabaggers who think any and all social programs are a waste of money that "enable" people and fraud.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 10/27/2009 @ 11:45PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
So, wouldn't you agree, that the 2010 Census should count everyone,(undocumented and citizens?)
(You made me laugh.) The tea-baggers are a bunch of religious wretches, and displaced Republicans. I agree with your point; I need to find my pitchfork.
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/28/2009 @ 04:43PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yeah, they should count EVERYONE and as they are. Quit making us lie. I can't even LEGALLY tell the truth about my ethnicity because I'm not papered like an AKC puppy - no other ethnicity or race has to do that. My lack of papers makes me legally white and I'm not white anyone looking at me can see that - and even *I* know it from all the racial slurs that have been hurled my way over my lifetime. I don't want "benefits" either as many would allege by my desire to say what I am, I just want to be able to quit lying for the government - and I shouldn't need papers for that. Nor should someone be discounted from the lists of homelessness or unemployment or whatever because of false definitions. And yes, we should be counting the undocumented. How else are we going to know how big of a problem we do - or don't - have and what categories (age, countries of origin, etc.) they fit into?
I don't know about the tea-baggers being religious. More like false religion. They wouldn't be nearly so obnoxious if they'd honestly believe the religion they claim to follow - as in all of said religion - and then actually practice it, including bits like loving thy neighbor like thyself, the many reminders to take care of the poor, particularly the sick, the widowed, etc. and the emphasis on not judging others until you've fixed all your own problems... Bunch of greedy, pompous, spiteful hypocrites is what they are.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 10/28/2009 @ 04:56PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree all too much! The part that is most confusing to me, regarding the Tea Party Movement; "their one step away from Welfare themselves." How does blaming Welfare recipients get people off of Welfare? Being called,"lazy," or any racial slur, is a small price to pay for subsidized housing, free medical care, and food enough to fill your childrens' stomachs. When faced with the alternative, (here in California:) $8/hour, no medical benefits, "slum-housing"(over $1,000/month;) the choice would be obvious.
Now, we have Utah complaining about, "counting undocumented-immigrants, in the 2010 Census." "F-U Utah." We have a higher poverty level of "documented citizens," than your state anyhow. Heaven forbid, our children have a chance to obtain a half-decent education, or participate in after-school activities.
I refuse to jump on the "Obama-bandwagon." We shouldn't have to depend on our government to dole out their meager, petty-jobs, that will only benefit the wealthy. (I don't see them paying to retrofit low-income housing, or homeless shelters. Only government buildings and their rich, affiliated-constituents'.) These jobs will only sustain the lower middle-class long enough, for Obama to sell the rest of our economy to a different country,(other than China.)
Needless to say,"I like the pitchfork idea."
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/28/2009 @ 08:01PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I AM A WORKING WOMAN WITH 1 JOB THAT PAYS LOUSY I BARELY MAKE THE RENT AND NEVER HAVE ENOUGH $$ FOR FOOD OR ANYTHING ELSE INCLUDING UTILITIES AND ETC THANKS FOR LISTENING
Posted by kimberly kishketog on 10/28/2009 @ 01:48PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Kim!
You might want to look at this website.
http://capwiz.com/nlihc/issues/alert/?alertid=14172506
Posted by Mary Acosta on 10/29/2009 @ 10:40AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Kim
You are the point. there are 70% of all workers who are paid less then the amount needed to live. LS No it is not worth being insulted and called name's when by HUDs Own figures only 25% of those who qualify for housing gets it.
The wait period for housing, in most states are 2 years to a decade. How you you be sure which person to call lazy? How can you be sure sure they are getting aid? 75% and up do not get housing.
LS are you lazy because you take time to post here? I do not think you want to be called that. So don't others.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 10/29/2009 @ 09:10AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Might as well get that all the way honest... That's a wait of 2-10 (or more) years *IF* you can even get on the wait list for housing/housing assistance. No flipping wonder why we have so many who are (or should be counted as) homeless. I've been trying for FIVE YEARS to get on the local wait list with HUD and I can't even get on the LIST, never mind actually getting HELP. There's not even rhyme or reason to it either. The wait list gets to a certain point, and they take a certain number of new entries from those who apply and are eligible "by lottery". Which means I could live here the rest of my life (and live to over 100 - I just turned 40 this year) and NEVER even get on the flipping list. That earns some words I can't say here.
ONE local place would help me at one point, but it was a SENIOR (as in age 55+) complex (note that I just turned 40 - and this was at least 3 years ago - which makes the idea pretty weird even if I am disabled) in the middle of nowhere with long walks to the bus lines. I don't drive now by preference (it's cheaper not to and where I currently live I'm at the intersection of many major bus lines) and at the time I wasn't supposed to drive because of the state of my neurological conditions. I would have literally needed a willing driver to go anywhere. That's not an acceptable deal even if the rent was better - and it wasn't all that much better. Plus, as I often mention, most of the housing assistance programs around here not only have maximum incomes they also have MINIMUM incomes. People like me don't qualify for most programs so you see a lot of people like me paying half our income for rent or trying to survive in roach motels that also get used as drug dens and flop houses for prostitution.
But enough posting for now. I have errands to run and need to quit procrastinating.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 10/29/2009 @ 10:06AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ms. Jan, I think you have misinterpreted my comment; I did not write it to offend. My negative reference was toward "The Tea Party-Movement." (Maybe you haven't had the "pleasure," of crossing their idealistic-trail yet?)
Anyhow, they take the tone of "Welfare being the choice of lazy people or specific ethnicity's." My point was:"they can call names all they want; doesn't change the fact that people can't afford to live on minimum-wage. (Yes, Ms. Jan, I agree; nobody should have to put up with it.)
I am well aware of how subsidized housing works,(for my state.) Here, they call it, "Sec. 8 Housing." Our wait is more like 5 years. If your lucky enough to get it, you'd better not make 1 cent, over the poverty level index, or you'll find yourself out on the streets.
Ms. Jan, the part where we differ? You still lay your hope in the hands of our Government. I've seen what they're capable of, so I know better than to trust them. If you think I'm lazy for wanting more than just, "a select few people,"to get their chance, or have a way out of poverty......."I'm lazy then."
Posted by L.S. hope on 10/29/2009 @ 08:22PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Now I am using Change as therapy. I got a speakers engagement in Chicago, and thought the Maine Economic Human Rights, might help me gather the money required to fly there, pay fees and ground travel, to present a powerpoint to 500 people students.
But I did not ask for that. I tried to brooch the topic by asking the top dog, if he knew of anyone I could hit up for part of $500. He has many funding contacts. He could contact them or give the name to me and I would speak with them.
I have a group which thinks the trip is worth while, can lead to great contacts. Except Hospitality House Inc. Is broke. We wanted names to reach people who could afford to contribute.
I am NOT asking for money here, nor there. I am venting.
After all this group is fighting for the human rights of everyone the means and the dignity for capable people to accomplice their goals is humans rights. Respecting the poor and their wishes is human rights.
He told me his group would rather spend 500 on printing costs rather then travel. The group meets this Oct. 31, and I will ask them to personally contribute. This guy does not speak for the entire group, but he has a powerful lead.
Writing here aided me in coming up with phrases, as respecting the wishes of the poor, I will use to try and see if either individuals of the group or the group its self will help, as I explore newspapers and other avenues. I will go to the mall over the weekend with a can, and see how many kind people offer a dollar or ten.
It did not bother me that the top dog, said NO. But his suggestion that I hand it off to someone in Chicago, seems undo able The person I contacted has yet to get back to me, and the Presentation is on the 7th of November.
So when someone goes we can call anyone who takes our tax money names, I am upset. I am upset with a guy whose fighting for Economic human rights for all, and he tells a fellow fighter No-before he is asked. In doing so he is denying my right to present my power-point. Which is half done. This Maine group has more work to do.
How can they effectively fight for something they do not provide their own members?
I fill a dash better, with this poor persons therapy.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 10/29/2009 @ 09:58AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
When you count the people at poverty level the best place to start is the people on non service connecked pensionfrom the VA. The top payment per month is around 900 dollars a month. and yet the government pays COLA in most states to the people that work for them. In Alaska it is 25% of base pay.
Posted by James Brouillette on 11/01/2009 @ 06:45PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
A penison from the government, has nothing to do with the real level of poverty. Are apartments over $900 a month in Alaska? Then if they are then that penison does not Cover the need
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 11/02/2009 @ 02:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Sorry Jan, the peison from the VA is knewn to below the poverty level in most states.
Yes the rents in Alaska is high, so high that the government pays its worker 25% COLA just to work in the state.
More vets then you will ever know are under the level, and when this pointed out to the government the answer is then move away from your home and family and go some where it is cheaper to live.
The only apartments I could rent on that penison would be about 10 by 10. Then I could not efford the power bills that go with it.
Posted by James Brouillette on 11/02/2009 @ 04:25PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That's their answer for Social Security, SSI and SSDI too. But the obvious response - and a set of questions they either can't or refuse to even try to answer - "is move WHERE? move HOW? if I can't afford to stay where I already AM, how in the name of all things holy and unholy am I supposed to be able to pack up and move AND search for a cheap place AND move into it? Huh?" Guess they expect us all - on any of these categories of payment - to become homeless.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 11/02/2009 @ 05:19PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.