It's That Time Again
Published June 24, 2009 @ 05:54AM PT

It is Atlantic hurricane season again. As this time rolls around, I find myself happy to be living in a second floor apartment and nervous about the prospect of another storm coming our way. In addition to the terrible stress that impending storms bring to residents of a region still trying to recover from the physical and emotional damage wrought by Hurricane Katrina, evacuation is expensive. Further, the mandatory evacuation for Hurricane Gustav last year, which was the largest evacuation in U.S. history, demonstrated that local, state and federal officials haven’t done enough in the last four years to make the evacuation process easier, particularly for our poorest and most vulnerable residents.
Evacuation for a hurricane is a human rights issue. In the New Orleans area, shoddy levee construction and environmental degradation mean that it might not even take a direct hit from a hurricane to flood the entire city and drown thousands of people. We have to consciously construct policies that make it possible for everyone to evacuate.
Though this is not an exhaustive list, there are a few things I’ve learned about through my own work and relationships, along with the work of other advocates and organizers that need to change in order for everybody to be able to evacuate.
The New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice has taken the important position that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS):
… needs to issue a standing, written policy that immigration enforcement shall not be undertaken in association with any phase of disaster preparedness, relief, and recovery, to ensure that the protection of public safety and human life takes absolute priority in times of disaster. The policy should also state clearly that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) shall protect the confidentiality of information obtained in the course of providing humanitarian assistance to disaster victims, so that individuals may seek assistance from FEMA without fear that it will be used for enforcement purposes by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
People shouldn’t have to choose between deportation and evacuation. I’ve seen how difficult it can be to make this decision because I tried to convince an undocumented loved one to evacuate last year. Until DHS issues a policy in regards to this matter, some people are going to continue hiding in their houses rather than risking deportation, which means that people will die unnecessarily if a storm does hit.
People also need to know that they will still have jobs and homes that they can return to when they do evacuate. After Gustav, city officials would not allow people back into the city for several days, and people that had to evacuate to public shelters on city chartered buses got stuck in small towns all across the South. I spoke to people that were fired from their jobs because they took city chartered buses that did not get them back to their jobs in time. Many low-wage workers may have gotten time off for the evacuation, but they certainly didn’t get paid for it. My office received non-stop calls for weeks after the Gustav evacuation from people facing eviction. Gustav hit on September 1, and many of our poorest residents found themselves spending their rent money in order to comply with the mandatory evacuation order. Government officials could mitigate these factors by providing incentives to companies and landlords who take steps like continuing to pay their employees and not evicting their tenants in the event of a mandatory evacuation. State lawmakers should also legislate tenants’ rights in order to provide some of the basic guarantees that tenants in other places enjoy.
Finally, people need to know what they can expect in the event of a hurricane evacuation. Many people evacuated for Gustav thinking that they would get reimbursed for things like hotel and food costs. Often this suggestion raises cries about entitlement. I have heard some suggest that poor residents just need to learn how to manage their money and save up for evacuations that we know are bound to happen again. It is hard to imagine saying something like that to some of the desperate families that called us when they were on the brink of homelessness choosing to spend the rent money on a mandatory evacuation. No matter how thrifty you are, $6.55 an hour and no health coverage doesn’t leave a lot of wiggle room for evacuation savings.
But beyond that, Gulf Coast residents are entitled to assistance in the event of a mandatory evacuation. We deserve not be hungry or homeless because we follow mandatory evacuation orders. Katrina demonstrated that many of us are not able to assert those rights, and three years later, Gustav demonstrated that there was insufficient improvement for many of the most vulnerable in our communities. Hurricane season always brings with it a general sense of uneasiness, but policymakers need to do a lot more to foster calm before the storm.
(Photo of Hurricane Evacuation Route by Allio)
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Expect More Katrina Scale Displacement
-
Policies that Make People Disappear
-
Judge Rules Katrina Flooding Government's Fault
Comments (8)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Kate Scott is Coordinator of Outreach and Development at the Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center (GNOFHAC). Since 1995, GNOFHAC has been at the forefront of efforts to ensure open housing in South Louisiana. Since 2005 GNOFHAC has fought to ensure that all New Orleanians are able to return home by investigating fair housing violations, filing enforcement actions, and engaging in advocacy efforts with local and national partners. Kate is also a board member of the People's Institute for Survival and Beyond.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















I know this is contrary to My usual libertarian philosophy, but I believe government needs to look into banning building in major flood areas, and buying out people already there. The only structures in these coastal flood plains should be public parks and wildlife preserves. I don't care how much We update the levees We are only delaying an inevitable slaughter, especially in New Orleans.
Posted by Charlie Reed on 06/24/2009 @ 07:18AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The problem is Charlie, then that limits building in A LOT of places across the US. No more vacation homes in NC, FL, MS, etc. due to flooding and hurricanes (FL gets more hurricanes than any other state). No more rebuilding in California because of earthquake and fire risk. No more building in the flood plains in the Midwest. Even NYC is at risk for catastrophic flooding.
Much of New Orleans is on natural high ground, it's not entirely below sea level nor is it the only place in the US that is environmentally vulnerable.
I think there's a case to be made to limit development nationwide in high-risk zones, but there's no case for this to apply exclusively to NOLA.
Also, there's less need to limit development if we a) had smart disaster preparedness, mitigation and response plans nationwide, and b) invested in our infrastructure so levees - and bridges, for example - could stand the test of time and do their job.
Posted by Leigh Graham on 06/25/2009 @ 05:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Funny you bring up CA, Leigh. Few people ever complain about where people have built in strange, silly or unwise places there and it's never made into as big or as persistent a deal as whether or not the low-lying parts of NOLA should be rebuilt. Only reason I can figure is that it comes down to who owns the homes. Most of the homes in CA in not-so-wise places (like right on the shores of Malibu or up into Malibu Canyon) aren't owned by the poor - far from it. They're the homes of the rich and famous. Inevitably, generally these people get to rebuild and often with assistance. Strikes me as some sort of discrimination.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/25/2009 @ 10:29AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The other thing I would add, is what about disasters we can't predict? No one had any idea to expect the not too long ago earthquake in Tacoma, WA and certainly not to expect the one they got. They didn't seem to entirely think that Mt. St. Helens was still active. The Coalinga fault made its presence known with a rather strong earthquake. This suggestion, is rather dependent on the idea that disaster can be predicted - it can't, not always and sometimes it's the surprises that are the ones that REALLY send you for a loop rather than the ones you knew to plan for.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/25/2009 @ 10:41AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Leigh, I forgot to mention. I could not agree with you more re: illegal immigrants. All evacuees should have federal guarantee that immigration status will not even be looked at in either evacuation or shelter.
Posted by Charlie Reed on 06/24/2009 @ 07:24AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It should be mandatory - and decided well in advance who it's going to be and how it's going to be funded - that SOMEONE is going to provide assistance with evacuations. Otherwise, the reaction for many to an evacuation order tops out at a sarcastic answer like "uh, yeah, so you honestly think I'm going to walk out of town and outpace the incoming hurricane? Do I get someone of whatever you're on?" Too many people at poorer income levels are too likely to have cars waiting on repairs, licensing or even needing more gas than is necessary for such a trip (if they even HAVE a car) - never mind the other expenses also involved in an evacuation like food and shelter. Which means that if assistance is NOT made available or is NOT made available at adequate amounts, then many are left to the mercy of the storm - as we effectively saw with Katrina. And during an active emergency like evacuating in advance of a hurricane is NOT the time to be asking people why they need help or about things like citizenship or residency - just how inappropriate can you get...
The "manage your money better" is nothing more than an oppressive attempt at preventing an appropriate assistance program by making the poor responsible for something for which they CANNOT be adequately responsible because THEY don't have (and cannot get) adequate funding and/or resources. I know, Seattle and the greater Puget Sound are trying to pull similar in the name of "3 Days, 3 Ways" because of the local risk of winter storms, regional volcanoes, regional fault lines, etc. They want EVERYONE to have adequate supplies - food, water, medical supplies (including all medications) - to survive AT LEAST 3 days without help, and ideally their own transportation (along with the ability to walk miles), and their own methods of unwired communication; then to coordinate plans so their "group" (be it family, friends or whatever) know at least 3 ways to go to get to a particular meeting place. They don't seem to know (or if they know they don't care) that some people can't walk miles, that many prescription programs' rules don't allow stockpiling even their ideal 3-7 days of medications, that unwired communications are out of the budget of a lot of area residents, that many can't even afford cars (or to keep their cars running, insured, licensed and full of fuel), or that if you're poor enough for food stamps it's a great month if you reach the end of the month with plenty of food (never mind even fantasizing about setting up a minimum of 3 days' stockpile of non-perishable foods). I can't imagine what would happen if to that was added a mandatory evacuation, other than that, like during Hurricane Katrina, the poor would largely be left to Nature's mercies...because we're already not getting any help or even understanding.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/24/2009 @ 11:08PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Leigh, good points, I guess am being too simplistic. I hope at least that someone starts putting a lot more thought into this though. I have read of the danger of a massacre in New Oreans for yesrs.
Posted by Charlie Reed on 06/25/2009 @ 02:27PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I really need to proof read!
Posted by Charlie Reed on 06/25/2009 @ 05:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.