Poverty in America

Eating Healthy on a Food Stamp Budget...

Published June 25, 2009 @ 06:00AM PT

...is it possible?

I'm certainly not the first one to ask this.  Doing a little Google "research," I've come across quite a few bloggers (here) (and here, for example) who have asked the exact same question.

While theoretically it is possible to survive on the meager allotment allowed through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP aka Food Stamps), many who have attempted to prove this through a month-long (or longer) "food stamp" diet do not take into account the realities of needing to survive on such a budget.

Yes, if everything goes exactly as planned through an entire month, it is probably possible to eat a relatively healthy diet on a food stamp budget.  But what if your car breaks down and you need to get it repaired so you can get to work?  What if you or one of your children has to make an unexpected trip to the doctor's office?  It is this kind of unanticipated expense that cannot be simulated in any sort of experiment.

These expenses (that, lets be honest, happen on a fairly regular basis) make it difficult to eat healthy on such a regimented budget.  If you're getting down to the ends of your food budget and go to the grocery store and see a $3 bunch of broccoli, and know that you can get three cheeseburgers for the same price at a fast-food restaurant down the street, which would you choose if you were hungry?

So while it might be possible to have a healthy diet on a food stamp budget if everything else in your life is going perfect, that is usually not the case for those who have to rely on a tight budget just to feed themselves and their families.  Two things that the government must do is expand the income cap for food stamp eligibility and re-evaluate the federal poverty line as it is well-below what most experts believe constitutes a "living wage."

If you or someone you know are living on food stamps or a similarly tight food budget, you/they might want to check out the Los Angeles County Cooperative Extension website.  It has a very nice fourteen part series (so far) on how to eat healthy while on food stamps.

You also may or may not have heard that there is a new documentary coming out in the near future called Food Stamped. The film follows a couple (a nutrition specialist and a filmmaker) as they attempt to eat a well-balanced, healthy diet on a tight food stamp budget.  See the move trailer below.

(Photo credit: clementine gallot on Flickr)

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (12)

  1. Deanne Williams

    hmm.. I'm confused.  What does your car breaking down have to do with the amount of food you can buy with food stamps?

     

    You can't use food stamps to get your car fixed, so having an unexpected expense isn't going to reduce the amount of food stamps you get each month.  Let's say I make $1000 per month and I get $250 worth of food stamps.  My car breaks down and it's going to cost me $200 to fix.  Do I pay with my food stamps?  No.  So I still have $250 in food stamps to spend.

     

    Posted by Deanne Williams on 06/25/2009 @ 07:47AM PT

  2. Romy Carver

    Food stamps are not meant to cover a person's entire monthly food budget, they are considered only a supplement.  They usually run out no matter what a person does.  So once they're gone for the month, a person has to use cash to cover the gap in their food budget.  If there's a car problem, there goes some of the food money.

    Posted by Romy Carver on 06/26/2009 @ 01:22PM PT

  3. Greg Plotkin

    Thanks, Romy.  That's the problem I was trying to get at.

    Posted by Greg Plotkin on 06/26/2009 @ 01:27PM PT

  4. Reply to thread
  5. Greg Plotkin

    I tried to titled the post eating on a food stamp "budget," to avoid simply talking about food stamps themselves.  I apologize for the confusion.

    Realizing many low-income people are actually considered too wealthy to receive food stamp benefits (but have to skimp and save just to feed themselves), my post is really about eating healthy on a tight budget and how unexpected (yet often routine) expenses can greatly dimish the amount of money available for food. 

    Hope that clears things up.

    Posted by Greg Plotkin on 06/25/2009 @ 08:07AM PT

  6. jan Lightfootlane

    I am a person who nearly qualifies for foods stamps, a couple of dollars away.   I run a homeless crisis hot line in Maine. People who hasn't eaten in days call us. We give them information and occasionally buy food.

    Greg you are close to the truth, there must be an  illegal way of selling the credits on ebt cards.  How that would work I must admit I am not savvy enough to know. I am lucky to be able to post here twitter and face-book will not allow me to post. Think its something to do with my computer itself.

    Back to how do you repair a car on food stamps?  You get a crook who will pay 50 cents on a dollar then instead of $100 in food. you have $50 for repairs. That is if you are lucky enough to have a local crook.  Some give only 25 cents on a dollar

    I will allow you to call these food stamp swappers theifs, only if you can tell me in workable detail, how else do they survive?

    There is something WRONG with a system which turn good people into cheats.

    The governments own figures says in 16 states SSI does not pay enough to pay the average rent. Yet an SSI Check can mean you make to much for SNAP. I can see whaT IS WRONG, with a system which gives 25%-50% of those in need Less than it really cost to eat.

    PS If it were just your self making $1.000 a month you would not qualify for SNAP.  In many states, you would require 3 or 4 children to get $250 ebt a month. FOOD Stamps are NOT DESIGNED to cover the full need.

    Nor is everyone in poverty eligible to receive them. 2/3 of those in real poverty cannot buy food, and repair an appliance are not considered as being in poverty.

    Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 06/25/2009 @ 10:52AM PT

  7. Danetta Amschler

    The expectation with Food Stamps is that food stamps is NOT your entire budget for food but that you will contribute cash in addition to the food stamps toward buying food.  The reality is that whomever made the guidelines needs to step out of their ivory tower and see what modern expenses and modern poverty are like because all too often and in all too many cases because what the guidelines EXPECT simply is IMPOSSIBLE in reality.  For example, the guidelines EXPECT that you will ONLY be spending ONE THIRD of your income or up to $389/mo (which ever is less) toward rent.  I'd love to know where to find those rent prices, as far as I can tell they DO NOT exist and around here entry level rents are easily at least $550/mo for something in a roach motel type apartment building.  It's been established by groups like www.workingpoorfamilies.com (I think that's their URL) that in many places what the poor pay for rent is more like half their income, which is far above the expected or allowed amount.

    Another well out of line expectation is your car.  They allow $2000 if you're disabled.  A $2000 car very likely won't run.  I know, I've had too many of them - and they're SUPPOSED to be my transportation to medical appointments, yet I can't sell them (they become a cash asset) and I can't buy anything that's worth more or the asset still counts against me.  I'm not sure what the allowance is for families with children.

    Factor in similarly out of touch ideas and by the time you get to the point in your budget where they THINK you're going to have some money to spend on food, there's simply NOT any money.  Add to this that the money given via food stamps only barely begins to buy food because they clearly have NO idea what food actually costs... Well, the problem becomes painfully obvious and that's even without unexpected bills like a car repair.

    It doesn't help that the policies are rooted in a very mistaken idea about poverty.  The Federal Poverty Line is an incredibly bad way of figuring poverty because its based on one woman's assumptions and presumptions about what expenses were in the 60's and how they should relate to the family budget as extrapolated from a report about food costs.  How we can have any sort of honest help for the poor - or an honest assessment of this nation's poverty - using this as a basis, is quite disturbing to try to figure out.

    Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/25/2009 @ 10:57AM PT

  8. Romy Carver

    The Federal Poverty Guideline is based on statistics that were established back in 1962.  A great website to learn more about poverty is www.combarriers.com.  The site is Communication Across Barriers and the president is Donna Beegle.  Her story is truly inspirational and she is one of my personal heroes.

    Posted by Romy Carver on 06/26/2009 @ 01:55PM PT

  9. Danetta Amschler

    Thanks for sharing that website.  Correcting the FPL and then making the adjustments made necessary to all the programs by a more accurate assessment of what actually IS poverty would go a long way to fixing certain snafus that are entrenched by the very sadly mistaken policies of our nation's "assistance programs". 

    I don't have a problem as a poor person with being expected to contribute to my expenses.  I don't think that's unreasonable at all.  What I think IS unreasonable is telling me that I've "overspent" and that no adjustments can be made because REALITY says that rents are FAR above the allowed 1/3 of my income AND also FAR above the allowed $389/mo.  That is NOT *my* fault.  That rents are so far out of line with guidelines is the fault of policy wonks who haven't set foot outside their cubicles for a few decades to see what actual rents are.  My rent has increased almost $150/mo in five years and even at that pace it started at and remains "miraculously cheap for any where in Seattle" with a current rent of $550/mo on a small studio.  I still don't know where I even CAN rent anything for the ALLOWED $389/mo and I've looked in several states with the help of friends.  Even just sticking with locally, when my utilities kick in with next month's rent, that's about a $200/mo difference between "dirt/miraculously cheap local rent" and "the allowed rent".  Surely a policy wonk could figure this out and find a way to make adjustments.

    Don't tell me that I'm "overspending" when other expenses also go over "allowances" because of REALITY either.  That the USDA continues to insist that their budget menu costs approx. $20/week (or maybe it's that per week per person - I'm doing it from memory and late at night) shows they haven't shopped lately or at least they don't do any of their shopping estimates west of the Rockies.  I know this much, I can go halfway to Tacoma to hit the cheapest grocery store in the Puget Sound area and I *still* won't get the budget menu for what the USDA says it should cost.  Don't any policy wonks shop for food and notice prices?  Surely someone could be paid to bother to do so, heck, I'm sure a few of us on food stamps would volunteer if allowed to keep the groceries we were sent to price.

    It'd also help - and help IMMENSELY - if welfare departments had fair rules and enforced them FAIRLY and ACCURATELY.  As an example, I'm fighting right now - and it's looking like I may have to actually go to a hearing - because someone in DSHS decided that because I'm not eligible for the service dog allowance (which MAY be technically correct), I also can't deduct him or any other medical expenses from my income to have it adjusted for the purpose of figuring my food and medical assistance. Why?  Because I'm on Medicare.  I don't see what difference that makes in deducting his costs and I turned in the expenses making it clear that if I couldn't get the allowance, I wanted his expenses and the others deducted.  Or as another example, how do they figure that childless homes - often seniors or disabled - don't need the things bought with cash aid like dish soap and toilet paper?  I use those examples for a reason - when waiting for my disability, I went into a welfare office asking about general assistance and instead of being told about that county's version of general assistance, I got the answer "adults don't need things like dish soap and toilet paper."  I wish I could honestly say I was kidding when I say that.

    So here I am spending roughly half my income on rent, plus more on utilities, plus phone, plus medical expenses that can't be avoided, plus the food costs that are a lot more than I'm told by agencies that they're supposed to be, etc. - and it's all supposedly my fault?  Just like the many others who are poor - how did it become OUR fault that THEY didn't accurately assess poverty?   And how is it OUR fault that we can't stretch painfully inadequate help to make it do what it should?  And why do our pleas fall on deaf ears all too often or when they don't they frequently result in accusations of greed and class warfare or stuff like "get a job".  As if poverty and our inability to escape was all our fault.

    Rant over, I promise.  I'm just tired of this.  I never thought needing medical care would come to this.

    Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/27/2009 @ 12:02AM PT

  10. Reply to thread
  11. Jocelyn Gallant

    Food stamp should not be accountable as income, Credit cards should be fair to all American to allow them to accuess to Equal Credit Opportunity accuse to Credit Card offers rather then denying he or she accuses to equal credit opportunities in this Country.

    Especially the prices of food today has risen so high today that is driven people out of the supermarkets and other retail because the made too much profits. It should not be that way in the United States of America we the richest country in the world. Every Americans should have $5,000.00 a month to be able to live on that what is badly need in American that will end poverty.

     

    Jocelyn Gallant

    Salem, New Hampshire  

     

    Posted by Jocelyn Gallant on 06/27/2009 @ 07:37PM PT

  12. Leigh Graham

    Hi Jocelyn,

    Food stamps are not counted as income.

    Leigh

    Posted by Leigh Graham on 06/28/2009 @ 04:58AM PT

  13. Reply to thread
  14. Jocelyn Gallant


    Jun 20, 2009

    Senator Judd Gregg
    Constitution and Delaware Avenues, NE
    Washington, DC 20510-2904

    Dear  Senator Gregg,

    I am writing to urge you to  include long term services and supports in
    health care reform.  Please co-sponsor and support the Community Choice
    Act (S. 683/H.R. 1670) and the CLASS Act (S. 697/H.R. 1721).

    The Nation lacks a system to adequately and efficiently deliver high
    quality long-term services and supports.

    Nearly half of all funding for these services is now provided through
    Medicaid, which requires individuals to become and remain poor to
    receive the help they need. There is also an institutional bias in
    Medicaid which directs approximately two-thirds of all spending to
    nursing homes and other institutions instead of preferred and more cost
    effective community-based services and supports.

    We must strengthen and sustain the Medicaid safety net for Americans
    with limited means. Medicaid is the primary payer for long-term
    services and supports, but states are having an increasingly difficult
    time affording it. Almost 10% of state budgets are now spent on
    Medicaid long-term services and supports.

    I urge you to co-sponsor the two bills that address these critical
    issues and include them a health care reform package: The Community
    Choice Act (S. 683/H.R. 1670); and the CLASS Act (S. 697/H.R. 1721).

    Sincerely,

    Ms. Jocelyn Gallant
    5 Friendship Dr
    Salem, NH 03079-3016

    Posted by Jocelyn Gallant on 06/27/2009 @ 07:50PM PT

  15. Leigh Graham

    Jocelyn,

    This letter is off topic for this post.  Please make sure you post your actions or comments in related threads.

    Thanks,

    Leigh

    Posted by Leigh Graham on 06/28/2009 @ 04:58AM PT

  16. Reply to thread

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Greg Plotkin

Greg Plotkin is currently a grant-writer living in Washington, DC. As a two-year AmeriCorps member teaching in DC Public Schools, he saw families struggling with poverty on a daily basis and has become particularly interested in hunger, nutrition and food access issues. He has also viewed poverty through the lens of his work with Habitat for Humanity and Charlie's Place--a DC soup kitchen and homeless support center.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.