Action Alert: Congress Must Move on Immigrants' Rights & Gender Equity

categories: Activism, Children, Federal, Government, Immigration, Incarceration & Crime, Jobs & Unemployment, News, Race Ethnicity Class & Gender, Women

Published June 24, 2009 @ 12:00PM PT

Apparently all the dawdling in Congress is getting under the skin of the NY Times Editorial staff, evidenced by three editorials yesterday demanding Obama lead on the Dream Act, the Paycheck Fairness Act, and legal aid. Read on to learn more about these bills and why we must nudge the Senate (and House) towards passage of these bills that will go a long way towards fighting poverty.

Dave has written extensively about the Dream Act, and we had a great guest post about it here some months ago. For those not familiar, the Dream Act would provide citizenship for undocumented high school graduates who complete two years of college or military service. The benefits of the Act are manifest for our country. Most of these kids have been brought to this country illegally as minors but now have a high school diploma and an opportunity for higher education and the earnings potential that follows or the willingness and desire to serve our country. Denying these residents their citizenship is punitive and short-sighted.

The Paycheck Fairness Act was originally introduced with the Lily Ledbetter Act, signed into law in January. The Paycheck Fairness Act offers more civil rights protections for workers who discuss salaries with one another and require employers to prove that wage gaps are skill-related, not gender-related. The bill needs Senate approval; Dodd (D-CT) and Mikulski (D-MD) have recently signed on as co-sponsors.

Finally, federal legal aid comes with three key crippling restrictions, which the Senate now has the power to eliminate. Like the House, it should lift the restriction on legal aid attorneys' ability to collect defendants' attorneys' legal fees in fraud cases. It should also go further than the House and remove the restriction on legal aid clients to participate in class action law suits, and remove these restrictions for non-federal legal aid funds in states that receive federal $$. As the NYT writes, "In New Jersey, for example, where only 13 percent of the financing for legal services programs comes from Washington, the federal restrictions dictate how the other 87 percent may be spent. The only thing accomplished by such federal overreach is to narrow poor people’s access to justice."

The need for legal aid services is on the rise around the country. Women still make $.78 for every man's $1. We've got a chance to expand opportunity for service-oriented, driven immigrant youth. Let's not miss these opportunities while we've got the chance.

Contact your representatives and tell them to support the Dream Act, the Paycheck Fairness Act, and to lift the oppressive restrictions on the Legal Services Corporation in the Justice Department financing bill.

(Photo of the US Capitol by Seansie)

Share this Post

Comments (3)

Click on the Actions on the right to support the Paycheck Fairness and Dream Acts!

Posted by Leigh Graham on 06/24/2009 @ 12:57PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Leigh
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
The need for legal aid is so dire here in WA that I can't really begin to put it into words. You're right that this desperately needs to be corrected. I've been trying to get help for months now without luck, so I'm doing things as best I can as based on do-it-yourself guides. This is beyond nuts - and has at least resulted in a delay of justice. Any ideas on how to fix this beyond we clearly need more funding and/or volunteers and to remove the funding restrictions you mentioned?

Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/24/2009 @ 11:20PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
Danetta,

One of the stories I keep failing to report on here is how stretched legal aid is nationwide. I regularly see reports of how overstretched state and city legal aid programs are, such that lawsuits are being considered due to the denial of justice.

Leigh

Posted by Leigh Graham on 06/25/2009 @ 05:55AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Like
Reply to thread
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Danetta
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

Comment

Check Spelling

Email me when there are new posts to this thread
Comment Policy

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Leigh is a PhD candidate in urban planning at MIT, and a consultant on U.S. Gulf Coast recovery. She sits on the Board of the Allston-Brighton Community Development Corporation in Boston, and has worked with non-profits, foundations and local governments on policies and programs aimed at reducing urban poverty and inequality.